# Chaos in optics

Fortunato Tito Arecchi and Riccardo Meucci (2008), Scholarpedia, 3(9):4104. | doi:10.4249/scholarpedia.4104 | revision #137596 [link to/cite this article] |

**Chaos in optics** refers to the onset of deterministic chaos in optical systems. In a continuous dynamical system chaos may occur only for a coupled nonlinear system of three degrees of freedom. Since Maxwell equations are linear, provided the optical polarization of a medium is linear in the applied field, the overall field-medium equations are linear and consequently chaos would be ruled out from optics with natural light sources whose weak field is unable to elicit sizeable nonlinearities. In order to observe chaos, one has to recur to fields of high enough intensity to induce a nonlinear medium response; thus chaos in optics has become observable in conjunction with laser sources.
Due to the fact that just three coupled degrees of freedom are sufficient for one positive Liapunov exponent, preliminary studies of chaos in optics had addressed single mode lasers (see Chaos in lasers).
On the other hand, some breakthroughs have signed optical science and technology in recent years, namely,
i) many mode lasers, emitting over many frequencies and directions, and providing high light intensities, sufficient to elicit nonlinear optical responses either within the same laser medium or in other media shined upon by the lasers;
ii) introducing a delay in the laser dynamics implies a large number of degrees of freedom, even without redesigning the laser cavity for housing many optical modes;
iii) if many chaotic lasers are coupled in a network, even though the single one is still chaotic (that is, without attempting some of the control operations discussed in Chaos in lasers), the individual chaotic behaviors can be synchronized; the onset of such a collective synchronization is relevant for communication technologies as well as for modeling neuron behavior in a brain during a perceptual task.
In view of these considerations, the subject matter is organized as listed in the following outline with many emphasis on the case studies i),ii) and iii). As for generic chaos in nonlinear optical media due to incident fields, we present two examples, namely, active media providing gain and thus oscillation in a cavity, and passive media, transforming a plane wave incident field in a chaotic pattern.

## Contents |

## The many mode laser and space-time chaos (patterning)

### longitudinal case

In Fig.1, i) and ii) refer to laser cavities designed to house only longitudinal modes,that is, fields travelling along the cavity axis. In fact, if \(L\) is the mirror separation and \(d\) the mirror diameter, the number of diffraction angles \(\lambda/d\) that can be accepted by the aperture angle \(d/L\) is given by the Fresnel number:

\[F=\frac{d^2}{\lambda L}\ .\]

For example in a gas laser \(L=1m\ ,\) \(\lambda\approx 10^{-6}m\) and \(d\approx 10^{-3}m\ ,\) so that \(F\approx 1\ ,\) and the laser cavity hosts a single transverse mode. If however the gain line is much larger than the longitudinal mode separation, (see Figure 1 (ii),

\[\Delta V_{gain}\gg c/2L\ ,\]

then many longitudinal modes can be simultaneously above threshold. In such a case the nonlinear mode-mode coupling, due to the medium interaction, gives an overall high dimensional dynamical system which may undergo chaos. This explains the apparently random spiking behaviour of long lasers. The regular spiking in time associated with mode locking is an example of mutual phase synchronization.

### longitudinal case with delay

A nonlinear system with delayed feedback, as the delay time \(\tau\) is much longer than the zero-delay correlation time \(Tc\ ,\) displays two widely separated time scales. In such a case, a two-dimensional representation shows close analogies between delayed chaos and space-time chaos in extended systems. These phenomena have been dealt with in A.188,102,214; in particular, A.214, provides evidence of phase jumps in chaotic time sequences, that, once folded in a two-dimensional representation, look like phase singularities in a two-dimensional fabric, to be discussed extensively in the next sub-section. When both non-delayed and delayed feedback are applied to the same laser, the combination of the two effects provides what has been called DSS(Delayed Self-Synchronization) and that is equivalent to the unidirectional coupling of a large array (virtually infinite in number) of lasers.

### transverse case

Inserting a photorefractive crystal in a cavity, the crystal provides high optical gain if pumped by a laser beam. As the gain overcomes the cavity losses, we have a coherent light oscillator. Due to the narrow linewidth of the crystal, a single longitudinal mode is excited; however, by an optical adjustment we can have a large Fresnel number, and hence many transverse modes (Figure 1 (iii)). The dynamic interplay of a few modes for \(F\) below 10, gives rise to an ‘’itinerancy phenomenon’’ whereby each separate mode shows up for a finite time, followed by a next one and so on. All modes alternate sequentially and the same sequence then repeats for ever, either with a regular (periodic) or irregular (chaotic) timing A.177. For larger Fresnel numbers, many modes are simultaneously above threshold giving a chaotic pattern.
If we had the random superposition of different waves, the phase relations would give rise to large peaks along directions where the random phase relations provide maximum field summation, intercalated by directions of zero field, wherever the random phases cancel the overall field. Such patterns are called *speckles*.
Let us consider a (2-D) complex field, as the solution of generic 2-D wave problem. The real ( imaginary) part of the field crosses zero at a point, as it continuously varies positive to negative. As we unite all zero points for the real ( imaginary) part we have a network of two families of lines. At each crossing point where the two families intersect the field amplitude is zero and its phase not defined, so that the circulation of the phase gradient (line integral of the phase gradient along a closed path surrounding that point) is non-zero (either \(\pm2\pi\)) yielding phase singularities. A phase gradient circulation \(\pm2\pi\) is called a topological charge of \(\pm1 \) respectively. In general two lines on a plane cross at least twice, yielding two singularities of opposite \(\pm1 \) charge.
The outlined feature is generic of a 2-D field. In the linear case, by the central limit theorem, we expect a gaussian statistics of the singularities (speckle behaviour). In nonlinear mode-mode coupling, we observe similar phase singularities, but with a statistics different from speckles. How to visualize phase singularities: a photodetector responds to the modulus square of the field amplitude. To have phase information, we superpose a plane wave light to the 2D pattern, so that the modulus squared of the resulting field includes an interference term, as illustrated in Fig.2.

For a high Fresnel number we have a number of singularities scaling in average as the square of the Fresnel number [A.197]. When both intersections of the two zero lines for real and imaginary part are within the mirror boundary, we expect a balance of opposite topological charges. However, for small Fresnel numbers, it is likely that only one intersection is confined within the boundary; this corresponds to an inbalance, as shown in Fig.2, upper right. The scaling with the Fresnel number is purely geometric and does not imply dynamics. The statistics of zero-field occurrences can be predicted on purely geometric considerations, as done for random speckles. If instead we look at the high intensity peak in between the zeros, the high fields in a nonlinear medium give a strong mode-mode coupling which goes beyond speckles and hence display a non-Gaussian statistics. A 1-D experiment in an optical fibre has produced giant optical spikes with non-Gaussian statistics [Solli et al.,(2007)]. The authors draw an analogy with the so called “rogue” wave in the ocean which represent a frequent problem to boats, since satellite inspection has shown that they are more frequent than expected on a purely linear basis. We consider the anomalous statistics of giant spikes as a case of complexity, because the mutual coupling in a nonlinear medium makes the number of possible configurations increasing exponentially with the Fresnel number, rather than polynomially.

### optical chaos and patterns in passive devices

Nonlinear dynamics does not necessarily require gain and self-oscillation as in a laser device. In fact, a nonlinear distortion of an impinging field can occur in course of propagation in a passive medium. If the geometry imposes a Fresnel number close to 1, then we have a single mode propagation (that of the distorted incoming wave) and no chaos can occur. In such a case, a well established phenomenon is that of optical bistability, whereby the output field can be at either a low level, having undergone an absorption in the medium, or at a high level, having propagated through the medium with practically zero absorption. This second scenario occurs beyond a critical field amplitude, as the two level transition of the absorbing transition saturates and the medium has become transparent. If the geometry allows for a high Fresnel number, then the impinging plane wave is scattered over many directions, and several modes propagate being mutually coupled by the medium nonlinearities. Once the dynamics imply more than 3 coupled equations, chaos becomes generic. If the field propagates in a high Fresnel number geometry, and the medium can be approximated by a fast cubic nonlinearity (class A dynamics in a so called Kerr medium) then the wave equation in the eikonal approximation is given by:

\[\frac{\partial E}{\partial\tau}=-E+E_{i}+i\eta(\left|E\right|^2-\theta)E+ia\nabla_{\bot}^{2}E\ ,\]

where \(E\) is the field amplidute depending on both time \(t\) and coordinate \( r_{\bot}\) transverse to the direction of propagation and \(E_{i}\) is the coherent injected field; the last term accounts for diffraction, and \(\tau\) is a scaled time \(t/t_{c}\ ,\) \(t_{c}\) being the mean cavity lifetime for photons, a=1/4\(\pi\)\(F\ ,\) \(F\) being the Fresnel number of the cavity, \(\eta=\pm1\) determines whether the nonlinearity is focusing or defocusing, \(\theta\) is the detuning between the field and the cavity frequency. A survey of optical chaos in extended media, both active and passive, is given in A.266.

## Mutual synchronization of coupled chaotic lasers

### general

Chaotic synchronization is a process wherein two or many chaotic systems adjust a given property of their motion to a common behaviour due to a coupling or to a forcing [Boccaletti et al.,(2002)]. Synchronization of oscillations in interacting lasers is one of the most relevant problems in nonlinear optics. Synchronization of chaotic lasers was first observed in Nd: YAG [Roy&Thornburg, (1994)] and CO2 lasers with a saturable absorber inside the optical cavity [Sugawara et al, (1994); Liu et al. (1994)]. Later synchronization of chaotic erbium doped fiber ring [VanWiggeren & Roy, (1998)] and microchip [Uchida et al., (2000)] lasers were experimentally studied. Particular attention has been devoted to synchronization phenomena in semiconductor lasers in view of their impact in telecommunication systems using chaotic carriers [Heil et al. (2001); Widekind et al. (2002); Shahverdiev et al. (2002); Koumou et al., 2004); Argyris et al. (2006)]. Synchronisation of chaotic CO2 lasers with intracavity electro-optic modulator has been also extensively investigated during these years considering their analogies with neurodynamics when they emit spiking and bursting patterns A.334. Synchronizing several chaotic lasers is easy if the single system is compact and low cost; it is a problem in the case of CO2 lasers. For these lasers, we report two kinds of coupling: i) unidirectional, in which a laser at site \(i\) is coupled to the same variable at site \(i-1\ .\) This corresponds to modifying the feedback term proportional to a suitable variable \(x_{1}\) by an extra term as follows:

\[x^{i}_{1}+\epsilon(x^{i-1}_{1}-\left\langle x^{i}_{1}\right\rangle)\ .\]

ii) bidirectional: each site is coupled to the nearest neighbors in a one-dimensional chain, with a modified feedback term as

\[x^{i}_{1}+\epsilon(x^{i+1}_{1}+x^{i-1}_{1}-2\left\langle x^{i}_{1}\right\rangle)\ .\]

### unidirectional coupling: single laser with delayed feedback

Adding a double feedback loop, as shown in Fig.5 we realize a DSS (Delayed Self-Synchronization). As the delay time is longer than the time over which information has been lost (reciprocal of the positive Liapunov exponent), the second feedback acts on a system which has lost memory of its initial conditions. It is as coupling a laser to an independent one, though with the same parameters. Let the laser without delayed feedback be set in a HC regime; it will emit a chaotic train of spikes. Let then activate the delayed loop with a delay \(Td\ .\) If during \(Td\) the HC system has emitted a certain number of spikes, such a spike train will be repeated once and once again (Fig.6). If \(\tau\) is the time lag between an input spike and a response spike, then DSS is equivalent to the unidirectional coupling of \(N\) systems where \( N\tau\)= \(Td\ ,\) (see Fig.5 on the right).

### bidirectional coupling and transition to collective synchronization

Study of large arrays of bi-directionally coupled lasers is costly, since one must do it on separate physical systems. One has to recur to cheap single Class B lasers, as e.g. diode lasers. Thus far, this investigation has been carried only numerically. The space-time plots of Fig.7 refer to 40 HC systems on line with bi-directional coupling. Each dot of the space–time plot reports the time of a spike occurrence on each site. For zero coupling, the dots are erratically distributed (Fig.7 a). As the coupling increases, the spikes become more and more correlated, until they get fully synchronized. Notice that spike synchronization does not mean iso-chronism: in fact a fixed time lag separates a spike from that on the adjacent site. If \(tr\) is the time separation of nearest spikes on two adjacent sites, we measure the amount of disorder in the spike occurrence via the entropy of the probability distribution \(p(t_{r})\ ,\) that is,

\[S(t_{r})=-\sum p(t_{r})log p(t_{r})\]

For HC systems, this entropy displays a sudden jump at a critical coupling. This is peculiar of spike synchronization, in fact if we investigate different coupled chaotic systems (as e.g. Roessler) the passage from high to low entropy is smooth (Fig.8).

An array of coupled HC systems displays a *semantic* property, which suggests a possible modelling of coupled neurons in the brain. Precisely if we set the coupling below the critical value (high entropy regime) and apply a short signal of amplitude A to the first system of the chain, for a suitable A, a transient state of collective synchronization arises (Fig. 9). The limited time duration of the low entropy state is crucial for a cognitive agent: indeed a minimal time duration is necessary to take decisions based on the input; on the other hand, the collective state must fade out and leave room for other tasks.

## References

The references of INOA group are listed as [A.# ] where the number # refers to the List of publications in the homepage: www.inoa.it/home/arecchi/

A. Argyris et al., Chaos-based communications at high bit rates using commercial fibre-optic links, Nature 437, 343 (2005) doi:10.1038/nature04275.

S. Boccaletti, J. Kurths, G. V. Osipov, D. L. Valladares , & C. Zhou, The synchronization of chaotic systems, Phys. Rep. 366,1 (2002) doi:10.1016/S0370-1573(02)00137-0.

T. Heil et al., Chaos Synchronization and Spontaneous Symmetry-Breaking in Symmetrically Delay-Coupled Semiconductor Lasers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 795 (2001) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.795.

Y. C. Kourmou et al., Effect of parameter mismatch on the synchronization of chaotic semiconductor lasers with electro-optical feedback, Phys. Rev. E 69, 056226 (2004)

Y. Liu & J. R. Rios Leite, Coupling of Two Chaotic Lasers, Phys. Lett. A 191, 134 (1994) doi:10.1016/0375-9601(94)90571-1.

Y. Liu et al., Chaotic and periodic passive Q switching in coupled CO2 lasers with a saturable absorber, Phys. Rev. A 50,3464 (1994) doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.50.3464.

R. Roy & K. S. Thornburg , Experimental synchronization of chaotic lasers, Phys. Rev. Lett.72, 2009 (1994) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.2009.

E. M. Shahverdiev et al., Parameter mismatches and perfect anticipating synchronization in bidirectionally coupled external cavity laser diodes Phys. Rev. E 66, 017206 (2002) doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.66.017206.

D. R. Solli et al., Optical rogue waves, Nature 450, 1054 (2007) doi:10.1038/nature06402.

T. Sugawara et al., Observation of synchronization in laser chaos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72,3502(1994) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.3502.

A. Uchida et al., Accuracy of chaos synchronization in Nd:YVO4 microchip lasers, Phys. Rev. E 62, 1960 (2000) doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.62.1960.

G. D. VanWiggeren & R. Roy, Communication with Chaotic Lasers, Science 279, 1198 (1998) doi:10.1126/science.279.5354.1198.

I. Widekind & U. Parliz, Synchronization and antisynchronization of chaotic power drop-outs and jump-ups of coupled semiconductor lasers, Phys. Rev.E 66, 026218 (2002)

**Internal references**

- Valentino Braitenberg (2007) Brain. Scholarpedia, 2(11):2918. doi:10.4249/scholarpedia.2918.

- Eugene M. Izhikevich (2006) Bursting. Scholarpedia, 1(3):1300. doi:10.4249/scholarpedia.1300.

- Fortunato Tito Arecchi and Riccardo Meucci (2008) Chaos in lasers. Scholarpedia, 3(9):7066. doi:10.4249/scholarpedia.7066.

- Olaf Sporns (2007) Complexity. Scholarpedia, 2(10):1623. doi:10.4249/scholarpedia.1623.

- James Meiss (2007) Dynamical systems. Scholarpedia, 2(2):1629. doi:10.4249/scholarpedia.1629.

- Tomasz Downarowicz (2007) Entropy. Scholarpedia, 2(11):3901. doi:10.4249/scholarpedia.3901.

- Howard Eichenbaum (2008) Memory. Scholarpedia, 3(3):1747. doi:10.4249/scholarpedia.1747.

- Rodolfo Llinas (2008) Neuron. Scholarpedia, 3(8):1490. doi:10.4249/scholarpedia.1490.

- Jeff Moehlis, Kresimir Josic, Eric T. Shea-Brown (2006) Periodic orbit. Scholarpedia, 1(7):1358. doi:10.4249/scholarpedia.1358.

- Arkady Pikovsky and Michael Rosenblum (2007) Synchronization. Scholarpedia, 2(12):1459. doi:10.4249/scholarpedia.1459.