Scholarpedia is supported by Brain Corporation
Control of partial differential equations/Examples of control systems modeled by linear PDE's
A transport equation
We return to the transport equation presented in the Section Examples of control systems modeled by PDE's. Let L>0\ . The linear control system we study is
\tag{1}
y_t+y_x=0,\, t\in (0,T),\, x\in (0,L),
\tag{2}
y(t,0)=u(t),\, t\in(0,T),
where, at time t\ , the control is u(t)\in \mathbb{R} and the state is y(t,\cdot):(0,L)\rightarrow \mathbb{R}\ .
One can put this linear control system in the general framework detailed at this link in the following way. For the Hilbert space H\ , we take H:=L^2(0,L)\ . For the operator A: D(A)\rightarrow H we take D(A):=\{f\in H^1(0,L);\, f(0)=0\},
For the Hilbert space U\ , we take U:=\mathbb{R}\ . The operator B:\mathbb{R}\rightarrow D(A^*)' is defined by
\tag{3}
(Bu)z=u z(0), \, \forall u \in \mathbb{R}, \forall z\in D(A^*).
Note that B^*:D(A^*)\rightarrow \mathbb{R} is defined by B^*z=z(0), \, \forall z \in D(A^*).
Let z^0\in D(A^*)\ . Let z\in C^0([0,T]; D(A^*))\cap C^1([0,T];L^2(0,L))
Let us prove this inequality forC_T:=1\ . We have
\tag{6}
z_t=z_x, \, t\in(0,T), \, x\in (0,L),
\tag{7}
z(t,L)=0, \, t\in (0,T),
\tag{8}
z(0,x)=z^0(x), \, x\in (0,L).
We multiply (6) by z and integrate on [0,T]\times[0,L]\ . Using (7), (8) and integrations by parts, we get
\tag{9}
\int_0^Tz(t,0)^2dt= \int_0^Lz^0(x)^2dx - \int_0^Lz(T,x)^2dx\leqslant \int_0^Lz^0(x)^2dx,
which shows that (5) holds forC_T:=1\ .
In fact, as one can easily check,
the solution to the following Cauchy problem
\tag{10}
y_t+y_x=0, \, t\in(0,T),\, x\in (0,L),
\tag{11}
y(t,0)=u(t),\,t\in(0,T),
\tag{12}
y(0,x)=y^0(x), \, x\in (0,L),
where T>0\ , y^0\in L^2(0,L) and u\in L^2(0,T) are given data, is
\tag{13}
y(t,x)=y^0(x-t), \, \forall (t,x) \in [0,T]\times(0,L) \text{ such that } t\leqslant x,
\tag{14}
y(t,x)=u(t-x), \, \forall (t,x) \in [0,T]\times(0,L)\text{ such that } t > x.
For the controllability of the linear control system (1)-(2), see at this link.
A linear Korteweg-de Vries equation
We return to the linear Korteweg-de Vries equation already mentioned at this link in the Section Examples of control systems modeled by PDE's. Let L>0\ . The linear control system we study is
\tag{15}
y_t+y_x+y_{xxx}=0,\, t\in (0,T), \, x\in (0,L),
\tag{16}
y(t,0)=y(t,L)=0,\, y_x(t,L)=u(t), \, t\in (0,T),
where, at time t\ , the control is u(t)\in \mathbb{R} and the state is y(t,\cdot):(0,L)\rightarrow \mathbb{R}\ .
One can put this linear control system in the general framework detailed at this link in the following way. For the Hilbert space H\ , we take H=L^2(0,L)\ . For the operator A: D(A)\rightarrow H\ , we take D(A):=\{f\in H^3(0,L);\, f(0)=f(L)=f_x(L)=0\},
For the Hilbert space U\ , we take U:=\mathbb{R}\ . The operator B:\mathbb{R}\rightarrow D(A^*)' is defined by
\tag{17}
(Bu)z=u z_x(L), \, \forall u \in \mathbb{R}, \forall z\in D(A^*).
Note that B^*:D(A^*)\rightarrow \mathbb{R} is defined by B^*z=z_x(L), \, \forall z \in D(A^*).
The regularity property (4) is equivalent to
\tag{19}
\int_0^T|z_x(t,L)|^2dt \leqslant C_T \int_0^L |z^0(x)|^2 dx.
From (18), one has
\tag{20}
z_t-z_x-z_{xxx}=0 \text{ in } C^0([0,+\infty); L^2(0,L)),
\tag{21}
z(t,0)=z_x(t,0)=z(t,L)=0, \, t \in [0,+\infty),
\tag{22}
z(0,x)=z^0(x), \, x \in [0,L].
We multiply (20) by z and integrate on (0,T)\times(0,L)\ . Using (21),
(22) and simple integrations by parts one gets
\tag{23}
\int_0^T |z_x(t,L)|^2 dt=\int_0^L|z^0(x)|^2dx- \int_0^L|z(T,x)|^2dx\leqslant \int_0^L|z^0(x)|^2dx,
which shows that (19) holds with C_T:=1\ . For the controllability of the linear control system (15)-(16), see at this link.
A heat equation
We return to the linear heat equation already considered at this link in the Section Examples of control systems modeled by PDE's. Let \Omega be a non empty open subset of \mathbb{R}^l and let \omega be a non empty open subset of \Omega\ . The linear heat equation considered in this section is
\tag{24}
y_t-\Delta y = u(t,x),\, t\in (0,T), \, x\in \Omega,
\tag{25}
y=0 \text{ on } (0,T)\times \partial \Omega,
where, at time t \in [0,T]\ , the state is y(t,\cdot) \in L^2(\Omega) and the control is u(t,\cdot) \in L^2 (\Omega)\ . We require that
\tag{26}
u(\cdot,x)=0, \, x\in \Omega\setminus \omega.
One can put this linear control system in the general framework detailed at this link in the following way. One chooses H:=L^2(\Omega),
However, without any regularity assumption on \Omega\ , (27) is wrong in general (see in particular Theorem 2.4.3, page 57, in (Pierre Grisvard,1992)). One easily checks that
\tag{28}
D(A) \text{ is dense in }L^2(\Omega),
\tag{29}
A \text{ is closed.}
Moreover,
\tag{30}
(Ay,y)_{H}=-\int_\Omega |\nabla y |^2 dx,\, \forall y \in D(A).
Let A^* be the adjoint ofA\ . One easily checks that
\tag{31}
A^*=A.
From the Lumer-Phillips theorem, (28), (29), (30) and (31), A is the infinitesimal generator of a strongly continuous semigroup of linear contractions S(t)\ , t\in [0,+\infty)\ , on H\ . For the Hilbert space U we take L^2(\omega)\ . The linear map B\in \mathcal{L}(U;D(A^*)') is the map which is defined by (Bu)\varphi=\int_\omega u\varphi dx.