Scholarpedia is supported by Brain Corporation
Talk:Expansive systems
This is a very good article, but it needs some clarifications. Moreover, a section on non-invertible discrete dynamical systems is necessary.
Typing has been done apparently without checking its effects; there are many small corrections to be done (I tried to make some of them).
General remarks:
A) Please do not start sentences with a symbol (f, x etc.). This is often confusing.
B) Please unify the way names like "quasi-Anosov", "pseudo-Anosov", etc. are written. Should the first letter be capital? Should there be a hyphen?
C) Expressions like f-invariant, f-persistent and similar should be written with a hyphen. Moreover, hyphens should be outside the math environment; they are not minus signs. There should be no spaces to the left or right of a hyphen.
Concrete remarks:
1) What do you mean by a "discrete dynamical system"? Apparently only an invertible one. However, a large part of the theory of dynamical systems is about non-invertible ones (continuous maps from a space to itself). In particular, there should be a section about non-invertible maps and expansivity (called sometimes positive expansivity) similar to the section on the flows.
2) When you say "chaotic", what do you mean? Which type of chaos?
3) I do not understand the phrase "However, the motion, the trajectories...".
4) In the same sentence: this is true only if there are infinitely many points in the \alpha-ball around x (in principle, x can be isolated). 5) Why is <math>M/R_\delta compact metrizable?
6) The reader may know what a conjugacy is. Maybe just refer to some other article in Scholarpedia?
7) Similarly with the 2-shift.
8) Notation \{a_n\} for a sequence is bad, it does not distinguish between a sequence and a set. As a set, \{a_n\}=\{0,1\}. It is better to denote sequences as (a_n).
9) It seems that if a_K\neq b_K then to get distance at least 1 one should take K-th iterate, not (-K)-th.
10) Can a set be expansive, or only a map?
11) Do points evolve?
12) In "Another example" formula, some parentheses after 1/... are necessary.
13) In Corollary after Theorem [L2], do we assume that M is locally connected?
14) The proof of the following Application is not full. In particular, it omits the rational rotation number case.
15) In the paragraph after Theorem [L1], I do not understand the grammatical structure of teh sentence.
16) In the same paragraph, a reference is missing.
17) In the same paragraph, what is e)?
18) In Theorem in the "On surfaces" section, it should be explained what r is.
19) The last 2 sentences in this section are unclear. This is a proof of something that is not stated explicitly.
20) The phrase "because of the classification theorem, every expansive homeomorphism of T^{2}" is not understandable.
21) In the same paragraph: Figure 3 illustrates "no c)", not "no b)".
22) Is "Are all the semi-trajectories of an expansive system persistent?" an open problem?
Dear reviewer:
We have taken account of all your suggestions and concerns.
best regards,
Marcelo Cerminara and Jorge Lewowicz
Dear Marcelo and Jorge,
I made some minor changes. The largest one was to remove the definition of the expansiveness of a non-invertible system (which was basically: the system is expansive if its inverse limit is expansive); I am not sure about its usefulness.
But of course you as authors will decide what is the best form and contents of your article.
Best regards, Reviewer B
User 3: Expansiveness of Denjoy map
it might be good to specify and stress that, in the Denjoy case, that the expansiveness holds on the subsystem of nonwandering set.